Search details
1.
Assessment of uterine contractions in labor and delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 228(5S): S1209-S1221, 2023 05.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37164494
2.
Novel uterine contraction monitoring to enable remote, self-administered nonstress testing.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 226(4): 554.e1-554.e12, 2022 04.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34762863
3.
Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach.
J Perinat Med
; 49(3): 241-253, 2021 Mar 26.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068385
4.
Intrauterine versus external tocodynamometry in monitoring labour: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
BJOG
; 127(13): 1677-1686, 2020 12.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32491233
5.
Safety of misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction using standard vs. adjusted retrieval criteria: a comparative cohort study.
J Perinat Med
; 48(5): 488-494, 2020 Jun 25.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32304314
6.
Update on uterine tachysystole.
J Perinat Med
; 47(2): 152-160, 2019 Feb 25.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30352043
7.
Is Prolonged Labor Managed Adequately in Rural Rwandan Hospitals?
Afr J Reprod Health
; 23(2): 27-34, 2019 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433591
8.
Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
; 8: CD005461, 2018 08 06.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080256
9.
Oxytocin Use in Labor: Legal Implications.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs
; 32(1): 34-42, 2018.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29240650
10.
Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
; 2: CD006172, 2017 02 15.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28205207
11.
A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
; 17(1): 31, 2017 01 13.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28086823
12.
Uterine electromyography during active phase compared with latent phase of labor at term.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
; 95(2): 197-202, 2016 Feb.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26575523
13.
Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry.
Am J Perinatol
; 33(9): 831-8, 2016 07.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26960704
14.
Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
; 1: CD006172, 2015 Jan 06.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25558862
15.
Is induction of labour by Propess(®) safe? A comparison of midwife-led versus obstetrician-led labour management.
J Obstet Gynaecol
; 35(4): 346-9, 2015 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25279771
16.
Cervical ripening agent dinoprostone for delivery induction in late pregnancy mothers: experiences of 685 cases.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol
; 42(1): 69-71, 2015.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25864286
17.
Labor progress indices and dynamics of the individual uterine contraction during the active stage of labor.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
; 40(3): 686-93, 2014 Mar.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24246065
18.
[The influence of the bupivacaine epidural anesthesia on the rabbit myometrium contractile activity and the functional state of the fetuses in induced labor].
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk
; (5-6): 91-7, 2014.
Article
in Russian
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25558687
19.
Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor.
N Engl J Med
; 362(4): 306-13, 2010 Jan 28.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20107216
20.
Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
; 208(1): 66.e1-6, 2013 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23122926